Fighting crime; fighting evil; fighting on social grounds; ever wondered if someone opts to fight divorces amid the tied knots?
So how is a divorced couple really different from the one that hasn’t exercised any relationship for that matter? You’re single when you’re not in love (or apparently when the ‘love’ isn’t a two way traffic!), and you’re single once again after you’ve kicked yourself through the entire iteration of grieving for love (and then tying the knot) and finally driving the same until it turns obnoxious and a ‘split’ is the only probable option to blaze all your guns at.
Right then; single before and single after – what is the distinguishing segment? Apparently it’s as similar as the layer of flesh that hasn’t ever been inflicted by any bruise; and another layer that had been plagued by a drastic cut in the past (where the pain consumed all the senses in itself), and just the scars that are left. Both are ‘alright’ now, but the amalgamation of the scars is the superficial distinguishing wall.
As for a divorce, the scar is nonetheless a social one. Contemplating on a personal scale, the verve is still an emancipating one, craving for life, screaming to be let free; but the curse is all in the society that (more than the claims of liberation and unshackling) has the swords raised high over their heads against the ‘divorcees’.
As for me, people are still hunting the grounds and digging up the graves for an answer to the same “Can a couple that has splat up find solace in a justification?”. Or to say, whom have (or had) the couple been married to – each other, or those thousands and the million portions of the outlandish populace; what is emphatically called to be a “society”.
It cradles up as a prosecution of the divorce itself, with the projection of an eccentric (and probably a menacing; enough to drive the orthodox souls into a hysteria) light trapped in the defence.
For the people caged within the boundaries of what the society calls as a ‘blessedness’; asking and begging to be unfettered out of it; is it really worth letting them (or to say, forcing them) be trapped within the holy matrimony. Is it really worth exhibiting a hollow trunk to something as an exuberant nurture; where you do nothing but ‘drag’ a relationship?
Exercising peace, rectifying things together can inevitably work wonders. But on a serious rhythm, what is the use of watering the entire desert envisaging for a forest cover? Do you really get what you had been yearning for?
The society’s psychology cannot bear a split, and probably the psychology of the relationship cannot cure its itch with it; so what coast does the same couple hit?
Speaking as for an offensive tackle (and yet a sensible one), its either sacrificing yourselves for maintaining the conventional (and preposterously orthodox) global peace, or release yourselves for your own good and throw no concerns at anything that fails to strike the encapsulated menace.
Life can certainly exploit “If Everyone Cared, Nobody cried”, but if something gets the frozen blood back into a liquid flow; where the cold breath can finally reach the lungs; where the fluorescents can once again take guard amid the intolerable ebonies; then why not go for it? Falling forever deep into the well of an intolerable infliction, pretending that things are actually drawn in a summer bowl – that according to me, is a complete rip off!
Synchronizing your inhibitions to that of the universal dictation, making believe (till an infinite stretch) for a harmonious onset at the end of the horizon at the time of an apparent war, envisaging that things would actually turn out to be a sweet rhythm SOME DAY – and selling it all off for the stake of someone’s happiness? Now if that isn’t something that is qualified to be called as a merciless irony, I wonder what the dictionary reads.
Everything “traditional” or “conventional” needs to be darted and laddered down into veracity – does it make sense? It is not an abuse to the conventionalities and definitely not cracking up the nut to advertise divorces, but a genuine call to social justice.